FTC Announces Increases to HSR Notification Thresholds for 2020

January 2020

On January 27, 2020, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) announced annual increases to the notification thresholds for premerger filings required by the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (the “HSR Act”). The HSR Act generally requires parties to transactions—e.g., mergers, joint ventures, acquisitions of assets or voting securities—that meet certain thresholds to file premerger notifications with both the FTC and the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”), and observe a statutory waiting period prior to closing. The annual increases will apply to transactions consummated on or after February 27, 2020.

Size-of-Transaction Thresholds

For 2020, the size-of-transaction notification thresholds will increase as indicated below. Importantly, unless otherwise exempted, acquisitions that will result in the acquiring person holding more than $94 million of the acquired person’s voting securities, assets, or non-corporate interests, will require an HSR filing (assuming the size-of-person thresholds are also met). As detailed further below, required filing fees will vary between $45,000 and $280,000 depending on the size of the transaction.

The size-of-transaction test will be met if, as a result of the transaction, the acquiring party’s aggregate holdings in the acquired party (as calculated under the HSR Act) will exceed any one of the notification thresholds. A proposed transaction that satisfies the size-of-transaction test may require an HSR notification if the size-of-person test (discussed below) is also met and no exemptions apply.

Size-of-Person Thresholds

For 2020, the size-of-person notification thresholds will increase as follows:

The size-of-person test will be met if one party to the proposed transaction has assets or annual net sales totaling $188 million or more and the other party to the proposed transaction has assets or annual net sales totaling $18.8 million or more. The size-of-person test need not be met, however, if the total value of the proposed transaction exceeds $376 million (this is an increase from the 2019 threshold of $359.9 million).

Filing Fees and Penalties

The filing fees required in connection with an HSR notification will not change in 2020, and will remain set at $45,000 for transactions valued above $94 million but less than $188 million; $125,000 for transactions valued at $188 million or more but less than $940.1 million; and $280,000 for transactions valued at or above $940.1 million. However, the FTC has announced that the maximum civil penalties for failure to comply with the notification and waiting period requirements of the HSR Act will increase from $42,530 to $43,280 per each day of non-compliance. These new penalties took effect on January 14, 2020.

Conclusion

Determining whether an HSR notification is required in connection with a transaction can be complicated, and requires an in-depth understanding of the HSR Act, the implementing regulations, and the applicable exemptions.

If you have any questions regarding the HSR Act, including whether or not a contemplated transaction will require an HSR notification, please contact Richard B. Walsh, Jr., David W. Brown, Oliver H. Thomas, Sarah A. Milunski, or a member of our Antitrust Practice Group.

Firm Highlights
Client Alert

DOL Publishes Cybersecurity Guidance for Benefits Plans

More
News

Michael D. Mulligan, Mysun Charitable Foundation Recognized at Greensfelder Park Ribbon Cutting Ceremony

More
Client Alert

First-Issued Interim Final Rule Gives Guidance on No Surprises Act

More
Client Alert

Supreme Court Limits Ability to Compel Access to Private Property Without Compensation

More
Client Alert

Missouri Supreme Court Reverses Overtime Wages Judgment Resulting from Employer-Mandated Screenings Under the Portal-to-Portal Act

More
News

Lewis Rice Welcomes 2021 Summer Associates

More
Client Alert

CROWN Act Legislation on the Verge of Passage in St. Louis City & County

More
Client Alert

FTC Adds Teeth to the ‘Made in USA’ Rule

More
Client Alert

Missouri Supreme Court Holds that Public Governmental Bodies May Not Charge for Attorney Review Time

More
Client Alert

Colorado Joins the Bandwagon, Enacts Comprehensive Privacy Law

More
Client Alert

The Changing Workplace Following the Latest CDC Mask Guidance

More
Client Alert

The New Standard Contractual Clauses: Scope, Impact, and Next Steps

More
News

Claims Filed for Compensation in North Carolina Ecusta Trail Rail-to-Trail Case

More
Diversity & Inclusion

Law Firm ILN-telligence Podcast Hosts Ronald A. Norwood to Discuss Mentorship, Diversity & Inclusion in the Legal Industry, and the Importance of Equity for All

More
News

Jeannine Moentmann Becomes President of St. Louis Paralegal Association for 2021-2022

More
Client Alert

Supreme Court Hands Down Unanimous Decision Limiting FTC’s Ability to Seek Monetary Relief

More
Client Alert

EEOC Issues Updated Guidance on COVID Vaccination Policies

More
Diversity & Inclusion

Lewis Rice Launches “Next Level” Diversity and Inclusion Programs

More
News

Jeremy P. Brummond Presents at Webinar for Experienced Construction Attorneys

More
News

A Lawyer’s Guide to the Galaxy Podcast Named Among Best Copyright Law Podcasts for 2021 by Welp Magazine

More