Supreme Court Limits Preferred Venue for Patent Litigation

May 2017

The possibility of being sued for patent infringement has been a concern largely because of the risk of having to litigate out of town from the defendant's headquarters and places of business, and often in remote districts like Marshall, Texas. That risk of increased expense and inconvenience was significantly lessened by the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling today, May 22, 2017, in TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Food Brands Group LLC. In an 8-0 decision (in which Justice Neil Gorsuch did not participate), the Court ruled that patent owners must file infringement lawsuits where the defendant “resides,” which essentially is limited to the defendant’s state of incorporation. This ruling upends nearly 30 years of practice following the 1990 Federal Circuit ruling of VE Holding Corp. v. Johnson Gas Appliance Co., and it reinstates the more-restrictive standard from the 1957 decision in Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.

This ruling will likely curb the concentration of patent infringement litigation in a handful of perceived plaintiff-friendly federal courts. The patent venue statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b), provides that “[a]ny civil action for patent infringement may be brought in the judicial district where the defendant resides, or where the defendant has committed acts of infringement and has a regular and established place of business.” As held in the opinion authored by Justice Clarence Thomas, “…a domestic corporation ‘resides’ only in its state of incorporation for purposes of the patent venue statute…” The Supreme Court had ruled in Fourco Glass Co. that § 1400(b) is the exclusive authority for venue in patent infringement actions, and was not to be supplemented by § 1391(c).

Lewis Rice covered this case in March of 2017, shortly before oral argument. Our prior alert noted that the Eastern District of Texas has been described as the “patent litigation capital of America” because over 40% of all U.S. patent cases are filed there despite few defendants' being located there.

The ruling is expected to result in patent infringement cases' shifting back to Delaware, which is the former hub of patent litigation prior to VE Holding Corp. and the place of incorporation of over a million businesses, over 50 percent of publicly traded U.S. companies and 60 percent of Fortune 500 companies. The implications of this matter for limited liability companies, foreign companies, and pending lawsuits are to be determined. Moreover, the final word might still come from Congress.

The attorneys at Lewis Rice have extensive experience in developing and protecting intellectual property rights, as well as in defending against claims of infringement. If you require assistance with your intellectual property portfolio or with limiting your risk of infringement, please call one of our intellectual property attorneys.

Firm Highlights
News

Lewis Rice Recognized as Top M&A Firm by BTI Consulting Group

More
News

Four Lewis Rice Attorneys Named 2022 “Lawyer of the Year” by Best Lawyers

More
News

Lauren R. Carey Creates New Blog for Social Media Influencers

More
Diversity & Inclusion

Golf Foundation of Missouri Awards First Larry L. Deskins, Sr. Scholarship

More
News

John C. Bodnar Named BTI M&A Client Service All-Star

More
News

David W. Sweeney Represents Advantes Group in $7.2 Million Apartment Project

More
News

Neal F. Perryman Named to Missouri’s POWER List in Employment Law by Missouri Lawyers Media

More
Client Alert

Property Owners Can Push the Issue Under Illinois Mechanic’s Lien Law

More
News

Brian P. Pezza Quoted in SHRM Articles on Employee Vaccination Status Disclosure and Employer Vaccination Policies

More
Client Alert

FTC Adds Teeth to the ‘Made in USA’ Rule

More
Client Alert

FTC Reverses Course on Treatment of Debt Payoff Under HSR Act

More
News

Lewis Rice Wins $1.5 Million in Compensation for Covington Landowners

More
Client Alert

OSHA’s New Guidance Regarding Indoor Mask Wearing, COVID-19 Vaccination Mandates, Regular Testing of Unvaccinated Workers, and More

More
News

Michael D. Mulligan Publishes Article in ACTEC Law Journal Comparing Sales to an Intentionally Defective Irrevocable Trust and a to Beneficiary Intentionally Defective Irrevocable Trust

More
News

Lewis Rice Wins Nearly $500,000 in Compensation for Sarasota Landowners

More
Client Alert

Missouri Now Requires Employers to Provide Leave and Accommodations for Victims of Domestic and Sexual Violence

More
News

Matthew J. Haas Offers Commentary for Inside P&C Article on Business Interruption Insurance and COVID-19

More
News

Michael R. Thiessen Recognized as Pro Bono Spotlight by KCMBF for August

More
Client Alert

Supreme Court Limits Ability to Compel Access to Private Property Without Compensation

More
News

61 Lewis Rice Attorneys Named Best Lawyers for 2022, 16 Named Ones to Watch

More