Rails to Trails FAQs

How do I know if my property could be affected by a federal rail-trail conversion?

The federal government will not notify you directly regarding a rail-trail conversion. The railroad must publish notice of its abandonment of the line in a local newspaper, and the federal order authorizing the railroad to sell the right-of-way for a public park is published in the Federal Register. However, most landowners learn about these developments only through local news reports or correspondence from an attorney.

How is this a “taking” of my property?

State law often provides that once a railroad abandons using its right-of-way for railroad purposes, the right-of-way disappears, leaving the property owner with unencumbered possession. However, the federal Trails Act preempts state law and allows the railroad to instead sell the right-of-way for use as a public park, a use that would have almost always caused the right-of-way to be abandoned under state law. This happens when the Surface Transportation Board (STB) issues an order authorizing property that had been subject to the right-of-way to be converted to interim trail use and "railbanked" (kept in tact for possible future reactivation of the line as a railroad corridor).

When the Trails Act went into effect, there was no provision in the law for property owners to be compensated. However, in the 1980s, a couple in Vermont challenged the constitutionality of the Trails Act. The case went to the U.S. Supreme Court, which ruled that the Trails Act was constitutional because the federal government has the power of eminent domain: the right to take your private property for a public purpose. However, being that the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution provides, “nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation,” the federal courts ruled that property owners whose land is taken as a result of the Trails Act must be compensated.

Do I have to file a lawsuit?

When the Trails Act is invoked to take private property it is an “inverse condemnation” case. This means that the government takes your property first and does not have to compensate you unless and until you file your claim for compensation and prove that the government took your property.

What if I don’t make a claim for compensation?

If you do not make a claim for compensation, you will not be paid compensation. This is not a situation where the government will offer to pay you for the land it has taken for the public project.

What if I don’t know how the original railroad obtained the right-of-way?

Your attorney must gather the documents necessary to prove the government liable for taking your property. This involves pulling historical records to determine the exact origin of the right-of-way adjacent to your property. At Lewis Rice, we will also acquire modern-day mapping, deeds, and other title records needed to prove the government took your property.

Will this lawsuit hurt or in any way affect the creation of a public recreational trail?

No, the lawsuit will not affect whether a trail is built. The lawsuit is against only the federal government for invoking its power of eminent domain to take your property and convert it to public-trail use. The lawsuit is not against the railroad, the trail group, or any other party. In fact, the Court of Federal Claims in Washington D.C. only hears cases for compensation against the federal government. The funds for the compensation come from the “Judgment Fund” at the U.S. Department of the Treasury, which is appropriated every year by Congress to pay the liabilities of the United States.

Why choose Lewis Rice?

Lewis Rice has represented clients across the country for more than a century and has the resources, experience, and support to represent landowners seeking to recover just compensation for the government’s taking of their property.

Lindsay S. C. Brinton and I have more than 25 years of combined legal experience and have successfully helped thousands of landowners across the country in recovering just compensation. We value the importance of property rights, and we understand the negative impact a Rail-to-Trail conversion has on landowners. If we know that the government’s offer is not adequate, we will go to every length to make sure landowners are fully compensated. We are not afraid to go to trial to make sure you are fairly paid. Indeed, we have a strong record of success in recovering just compensation for landowners along Rail-to-Trail conversions nationwide.

We have spent much of our careers pioneering this area of the law, having assisted landowners in the leading cases that have been repeatedly cited by courts and attorneys. And, while our cases may include dozens of owners, we pride ourselves on making sure your claim gets the individualized attention you deserve.

Firm Highlights
Client Alert

Federal Appellate Court Determines a Website Is Not a “Place of Public Accommodation” Under the ADA

More
Client Alert

Supreme Court Hands Down Unanimous Decision Limiting FTC’s Ability to Seek Monetary Relief

More
News

Lindsay S. C. Brinton and Meghan S. Largent Negotiate $1.4 Million Settlement for Landowners along Legacy Trail

More
News

Brian P. Pezza Gives Advice on Vaccination Acceptance in the Workforce in Society for Human Resource Management Article

More
Client Alert

Public Access to Electronic Court Records in Missouri

More
Diversity & Inclusion

Fatima G. Khan Elected President of South Asian Bar Association of Metropolitan St. Louis

More
Client Alert

Model COBRA Notices Under the American Rescue Plan Act

More
Client Alert

COVID-19 Rescue Plan Act Expands Paid Leave Availability but Does Not Revive Employer Mandates

More
Client Alert

Have You Done Your Annual CCPA Housekeeping?

More
Diversity & Inclusion

Two Lewis Rice Members Selected for Leadership Council on Legal Diversity Programs

More
Client Alert

Virginia Passes Sweeping Data Privacy Legislation Similar to CCPA and GDPR

More
Diversity & Inclusion

Lewis Rice Member Ronald A. Norwood Serves on Missouri Bar’s Special Committee on Lawyers of Color to Establish Diversity, Inclusion Programs

More
News

Jeremy P. Brummond’s Article on Waivers of Consequential Damages is Published in Construction Executive

More
News

Meghan S. Largent and Lindsay S. C. Brinton Negotiate $700,000 Award to Cobb County, Georgia Landowners in Rails-to-Trails Case

More
News

Kansas City Office of Lewis Rice Names New Member

More
Client Alert

CROWN Act Legislation on the Verge of Passage in St. Louis City & County

More
Client Alert

New York State Regulator Discourages Ransomware Payments and Publishes New Cyber Insurance Risk Framework

More
Client Alert

Temporary COBRA Changes Under the American Rescue Plan Act

More
Diversity & Inclusion

Law Firm ILN-telligence Podcast Hosts Ronald A. Norwood to Discuss Mentorship, Diversity & Inclusion in the Legal Industry, and the Importance of Equity for All

More
News

Jerina D. Phillips Offers COVID-19 Vaccination Advice for Employers in St. Louis Magazine Article

More