FTC Adds Teeth to the ‘Made in USA’ Rule

On July 1, 2021, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) finalized a new rule which prohibits businesses from making unqualified claims that a product is made in the U.S. unless: (1) final assembly or processing of the product occurs in the U.S.; (2) all significant processing that goes into the product occurs in the U.S.; and (3) all or virtually all ingredients or components of the product are made and sourced in the U.S.

The new rule covers explicit and implicit claims that a product is made in the U.S. (e.g. representations that a product is “made,” “manufactured,” “built,” “produced,” “created,” or “crafted” in the U.S.). Other phrasing, such as “True American Quality”, or even putting an American flag on a product, may constitute an implicit claim of U.S. origin.

Unqualified “Made in USA” claims appearing on product labels clearly fall within the purview of the FTC’s new rule, and it arguably extends to similar claims appearing in printed advertisements, as well as advertisements disseminated via e-mail or other electronic means.

The new rule does not differ substantively from the FTC’s prior guidance regarding claims of U.S. origin. However, it will allow the FTC to seek monetary penalties of up to $43,280 per violation. The FTC hopes this stiff penalty will send a strong signal to would-be violators, but it noted that maximum penalties are not necessarily appropriate in every instance.

In conjunction with the FTC’s announcement, the U.S. Department of Agriculture announced that it will complement the FTC’s efforts with its own initiative on U.S. origin claims for products such as beef, and other agricultural products regulated by the Food Safety and Inspection Service. Its efforts in this area are ongoing.

If you have any questions regarding compliance with the FTC’s new “Made in USA” rule, please contact one of our Advertising, Promotions & Social Media attorneys.

Special thanks to Patrick F. Ganninger for his contributions to this article.

Firm Highlights
News

Lewis Rice Wins Nearly $500,000 in Compensation for Sarasota Landowners

More
Client Alert

Supreme Court Limits Ability to Compel Access to Private Property Without Compensation

More
News

Michael R. Thiessen Recognized as Pro Bono Spotlight by KCMBF for August

More
News

John C. Bodnar Named BTI M&A Client Service All-Star

More
News

Four Lewis Rice Attorneys Named 2022 “Lawyer of the Year” by Best Lawyers

More
Client Alert

Missouri Now Requires Employers to Provide Leave and Accommodations for Victims of Domestic and Sexual Violence

More
Client Alert

FTC Reverses Course on Treatment of Debt Payoff Under HSR Act

More
News

Lewis Rice Wins $1.5 Million in Compensation for Covington Landowners

More
News

Lewis Rice Recognized as Top M&A Firm by BTI Consulting Group

More
Client Alert

OSHA’s New Guidance Regarding Indoor Mask Wearing, COVID-19 Vaccination Mandates, Regular Testing of Unvaccinated Workers, and More

More
News

Matthew J. Haas Offers Commentary for Inside P&C Article on Business Interruption Insurance and COVID-19

More
Client Alert

Property Owners Can Push the Issue Under Illinois Mechanic’s Lien Law

More
News

David W. Sweeney Represents Advantes Group in $7.2 Million Apartment Project

More
News

Brian P. Pezza Quoted in SHRM Articles on Employee Vaccination Status Disclosure and Employer Vaccination Policies

More
News

Lauren R. Carey Creates New Blog for Social Media Influencers

More
News

Michael D. Mulligan Publishes Article in ACTEC Law Journal Comparing Sales to an Intentionally Defective Irrevocable Trust and a to Beneficiary Intentionally Defective Irrevocable Trust

More
Diversity & Inclusion

Golf Foundation of Missouri Awards First Larry L. Deskins, Sr. Scholarship

More
News

Neal F. Perryman Named to Missouri’s POWER List in Employment Law by Missouri Lawyers Media

More
News

61 Lewis Rice Attorneys Named Best Lawyers for 2022, 16 Named Ones to Watch

More
Client Alert

FTC Adds Teeth to the ‘Made in USA’ Rule

More