EU-US Privacy Law Remains Unsettled after Article 29 Working Party Demands Changes to Proposed Privacy Shield Agreement

April 2016

On April 13, 2016, the Article 29 Data Protection Working Party (Working Party) refused to endorse the proposed Privacy Shield agreement between the United States and European Commission (Commission) slated to replace, as early as this summer, the recently invalidated "Safe Harbor" agreement between the two powers. The Working Party cited a need for revisions and clarifications of several points in the proposal before it would bless the Privacy Shield, in part because "some key data protection principles as outlined in European law are not reflected in" the proposal.

Among other things, the Working Party took issue with the national security exceptions in the proposed Privacy Shield, which, according to its opinion, would allow for "massive and indiscriminate collection of personal data originating from the EU" in violation of the fundamental rights of its citizens. With respect to these exceptions, the Working Party noted that it will look to forthcoming rulings of the European Court of Justice that could shed light on the legality of mass data collection in the EU. Another Privacy Shield item with which the Working Party took issue was the complexity of the proposed redress mechanism. The Working Party suggested clarification of the redress process prior to the ratification of the Privacy Shield.

Though the Working Party, which was set up under the 1995 Directive on the protection of personal data, is strictly advisory, the Commission may make revisions based on its suggestions. This could prolong the current period of EU-US data protection uncertainty. Furthermore, if the Commission chooses not to act on these suggestions, flaws cited by the Working Party may be targeted by plaintiffs claiming data protection violations in the future.

If you have any questions about data privacy and regulatory compliance, please contact one of our Cybersecurity & Data Privacy attorneys. Click here to view the full text of the Working Party’s opinion and here to view our previous alert about the invalidation of the Safe Harbor.

Firm Highlights
Client Alert

OSHA’s New Guidance Regarding Indoor Mask Wearing, COVID-19 Vaccination Mandates, Regular Testing of Unvaccinated Workers, and More

More
News

Lewis Rice Wins $1.5 Million in Compensation for Covington Landowners

More
News

John C. Bodnar Named BTI M&A Client Service All-Star

More
News

Lauren R. Carey Creates New Blog for Social Media Influencers

More
News

David W. Sweeney Represents Advantes Group in $7.2 Million Apartment Project

More
Client Alert

Property Owners Can Push the Issue Under Illinois Mechanic’s Lien Law

More
Diversity & Inclusion

Golf Foundation of Missouri Awards First Larry L. Deskins, Sr. Scholarship

More
Client Alert

FTC Adds Teeth to the ‘Made in USA’ Rule

More
News

Four Lewis Rice Attorneys Named 2022 “Lawyer of the Year” by Best Lawyers

More
News

Neal F. Perryman Named to Missouri’s POWER List in Employment Law by Missouri Lawyers Media

More
News

Michael D. Mulligan Publishes Article in ACTEC Law Journal Comparing Sales to an Intentionally Defective Irrevocable Trust and a to Beneficiary Intentionally Defective Irrevocable Trust

More
News

Lewis Rice Recognized as Top M&A Firm by BTI Consulting Group

More
News

61 Lewis Rice Attorneys Named Best Lawyers for 2022, 16 Named Ones to Watch

More
News

Lewis Rice Wins Nearly $500,000 in Compensation for Sarasota Landowners

More
News

Brian P. Pezza Quoted in SHRM Articles on Employee Vaccination Status Disclosure and Employer Vaccination Policies

More
News

Michael R. Thiessen Recognized as Pro Bono Spotlight by KCMBF for August

More
Client Alert

FTC Reverses Course on Treatment of Debt Payoff Under HSR Act

More
News

Matthew J. Haas Offers Commentary for Inside P&C Article on Business Interruption Insurance and COVID-19

More
Client Alert

Supreme Court Limits Ability to Compel Access to Private Property Without Compensation

More
Client Alert

Missouri Now Requires Employers to Provide Leave and Accommodations for Victims of Domestic and Sexual Violence

More