Notable Changes to the Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for ALTA/NSPS Land Title Surveys

March 2016

Effective February 23, 2016, the American Land Title Association® (ALTA®) and the National Society of Professional Surveyors, Inc. (NSPS) have revised the "Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for ALTA®/NSPS Land Title Surveys," including the Table A optional survey responsibilities and specifications. These minimum standard detail requirements set forth the minimum requirements a survey must satisfy in order to be certified as an ALTA® survey. These requirements generally exceed state minimum requirements. Table A sets forth a list of optional items a client may request be included in the survey, often for an additional fee.

While many of the 2016 changes to the 2011 minimum standard detail requirements are form over substance, the requirements are worth reading to understand both the product being delivered and the client obligations to provide the surveyor sufficient information to complete the survey. Both a clean copy of these updated requirements and a redlined copy of the requirements can be found by clicking under "Resources" below. In addition, real estate professionals charged with ordering and reviewing surveys should pay special attention to the following notable changes in Table A:

  • Item 6 – Zoning Information

Previously, under the 2011 requirements, title insurers were charged with obtaining zoning information and surveyors were required to reflect the zoning classification and requirements on the face of the survey (e.g., height and floor space area restrictions ), including, if requested, depicting building setback requirements.

Under the 2016 requirements, the client is required to provide the zoning information to the surveyor in the form of a zoning report or a zoning letter from the applicable municipality, and the surveyor is only required to depict setback requirements listed in such zoning report or letter if such setback requirements do not require an interpretation by the surveyor.

Practical Tip: Order your zoning reports or zoning letters at the same time or before you order your survey so that the survey can be finalized within a reasonable period of time. Also, make sure the surveyor is showing the distances between improvements and adjacent roadways and property lines to be reviewed in connection with the setback requirements.

  • Item 11 – Utilities

Previously, under the 2011 requirements, Item 11 was broken out into 11(a) (location of utilities existing on or serving the surveyed property based on observed evidence) and 11(b) (location of utilities existing on or serving the surveyed property based on observed evidence, together with evidence from plans obtained from utility companies or provided by client, and markings by utility companies and other sources).

Under the 2016 requirements, the minimum standard detail requirements now include what was previously Item 11(a) and new Item 11 requires the surveyor to request an 811 utility locate or similar service.

Practical Tip: If your customary practice was to order Table A Item 11(a) only, that no longer needs to be marked in Table A.

  • Item 18 (and Item 8) – Waste Dump/Sanitary Landfill

Previously, under the 2011 requirements, Item 18 required surveyors to depict observed evidence of the site used as a solid waste dump, sump or sanitary landfill.

Under the 2016 requirements, Item 18 has been deleted in its entirety. However, Item 8 now includes in the list of features to be shown by a surveyor "substantial areas of refuse". It is likely that this change was made, at least in part, so that surveyors are not making legal conclusions as to what constitutes a dump or landfill.

Practical Tip: Item 8 of Table A should be included in your survey order and if any area of refuse is indicated, the prospective property user should conduct an on-site evaluation of such area.

  • Item 19 – Wetlands

Previously, under the 2011 requirements, Item 19 required surveyors to locate wetland areas as delineated by appropriate authorities.

Under the 2016 requirements, Item 19 is now Item 18, and only requires surveyors to locate delineation markers of wetlands observed on the surveyed property provided there has been a field delineation of the wetlands by a qualified specialist hired by the client.

Practical Tip: If wetlands on the surveyed property are suspected, it is the client's responsibility to involve and rely on a wetlands specialist, and not the surveyor, to investigate and identify whether the area is wetlands.

Resources

Firm Highlights
Client Alert

Supreme Court Hands Down Unanimous Decision Limiting FTC’s Ability to Seek Monetary Relief

More
Client Alert

Federal Appellate Court Determines a Website Is Not a “Place of Public Accommodation” Under the ADA

More
Diversity & Inclusion

Law Firm ILN-telligence Podcast Hosts Ronald A. Norwood to Discuss Mentorship, Diversity & Inclusion in the Legal Industry, and the Importance of Equity for All

More
News

Brian P. Pezza Gives Advice on Vaccination Acceptance in the Workforce in Society for Human Resource Management Article

More
News

Kansas City Office of Lewis Rice Names New Member

More
Client Alert

Public Access to Electronic Court Records in Missouri

More
Diversity & Inclusion

Two Lewis Rice Members Selected for Leadership Council on Legal Diversity Programs

More
Diversity & Inclusion

Lewis Rice Member Ronald A. Norwood Serves on Missouri Bar’s Special Committee on Lawyers of Color to Establish Diversity, Inclusion Programs

More
Client Alert

Temporary COBRA Changes Under the American Rescue Plan Act

More
Client Alert

Have You Done Your Annual CCPA Housekeeping?

More
Diversity & Inclusion

Fatima G. Khan Elected President of South Asian Bar Association of Metropolitan St. Louis

More
Client Alert

COVID-19 Rescue Plan Act Expands Paid Leave Availability but Does Not Revive Employer Mandates

More
News

Jeremy P. Brummond’s Article on Waivers of Consequential Damages is Published in Construction Executive

More
News

Meghan S. Largent and Lindsay S. C. Brinton Negotiate $700,000 Award to Cobb County, Georgia Landowners in Rails-to-Trails Case

More
Client Alert

CROWN Act Legislation on the Verge of Passage in St. Louis City & County

More
Client Alert

New York State Regulator Discourages Ransomware Payments and Publishes New Cyber Insurance Risk Framework

More
Client Alert

Virginia Passes Sweeping Data Privacy Legislation Similar to CCPA and GDPR

More
News

Jerina D. Phillips Offers COVID-19 Vaccination Advice for Employers in St. Louis Magazine Article

More
Client Alert

Model COBRA Notices Under the American Rescue Plan Act

More
News

Lindsay S. C. Brinton and Meghan S. Largent Negotiate $1.4 Million Settlement for Landowners along Legacy Trail

More